Skip to content
Adv Allah Nawaz Khosa
  • home
  • Area Of Practice
  • My Landmark Cases
  • Service Case Laws/Precedent
  • My Online Legal Services
    • Expert Advice Online
    • Departmental Appeals
    • Case Drafting For High Court Writ Petitions
    • Service Tribunals Appeals
    • Legal Drafting for Supreme Court Appeals
    • Written Reply of Charge Sheet/Show-Cause
    • NIRC & Labour Court Cases
  • Gallery
  • Contact
  • About us
  • Toggle website search
Menu Close
Type then hit enter to search
  • home
  • Area Of Practice
  • My Landmark Cases
  • Service Case Laws/Precedent
  • My Online Legal Services
    • Expert Advice Online
    • Departmental Appeals
    • Case Drafting For High Court Writ Petitions
    • Service Tribunals Appeals
    • Legal Drafting for Supreme Court Appeals
    • Written Reply of Charge Sheet/Show-Cause
    • NIRC & Labour Court Cases
  • Gallery
  • Contact
  • About us
  • Toggle website search

Shazia Israr Vs CEO Education

  • Post published:December 16, 2023
  • Post category:My Landmark Cases
  • Reading time:1 min read

Counsel Name:Allah Nawaz Khosa AHC

Case Nature: Compulsory Retirement.

Result:Appeal was allowed and appellant was reinstated into service.

Tagline The imposition of a major penalty solely based on absence of 89 days is against the law.

To access the complete judgment, kindly click on the link provided below:

Shazia Israr Vs CEO educationDownload

Tags: Lawyers of Pakistan, Service Laws Tagline The imposition of a major penalty solely based on absence of 89 days is against the law.

Please Share This Share this content

  • Opens in a new window X
  • Opens in a new window Facebook
  • Opens in a new window WhatsApp

Read more articles

Previous PostService 66980/17 Muhammad Zahid Saleem Vs Secretary Govt of the Punjab etc
Next PostMuhammad Imran Vs IGP

You Might Also Like

Ahtisham ul Haq Vs RPO etc

December 17, 2023

Abdul Waheed Vs Secretary Livestock Etc

February 29, 2024
Read more about the article Tribunal Holds That Mere Absence of 67 Days Does Not Warrant Major Penalty of Dismissal

Tribunal Holds That Mere Absence of 67 Days Does Not Warrant Major Penalty of Dismissal

September 5, 2025

Recent Cases

  • Muhammad Nasir & Tariq Versus Pakistan Army (Military Farm)
  • ARSHAD MUNIR IP VERSUS IGP
  • Muhammad Tahir versus GOP Appointment Under Rule 17-A: Significant High Court Judgment 17/04/2026
  • Punjab Service Tribunal Protects Promotion Rights: Demotion Set Aside Due to Departmental Lapse
  • Lahore High Court Reaffirms Merit-Based Determination of Seniority

Facebook official Page

Contact Info

  • 33/A Queens Road, Behind Queens Centre,Mozang, Lahore
  • +92 333 6073636
  • adv.nawazkhosa@gmail.comOpens in your application
  • https://advnawazkhosa.com/
All Right Resereved | Adv Nawaz Khosa
Facebook Page
Twitter page
WhatsApp page